Swap
Swap
Yamaha CG162S
Yamaha CPX700II-12
VS
Playability
73
Sound
79
Build
60
Value
81
Score
71
FIND IT ON:
Amazon logoReverb logoMusician's Friend logoSweetwater logo
Playability
80
Sound
81
Build
65
Value
80
Score
75
FIND IT ON:
Sweetwater logo
Add to Compare
Add to Compare
Side to side spec comparison >

Yamaha CG162S vs CPX700II-12

Reasons to Get
Yamaha CG162S over CPX700II-12

Strings
6 vs 12
Narrower neck and fewer strings to change
Nut Width
2.047'' (52mm) vs 1.811'' (46mm)
Less likely to mute strings by accident and more space for fingerstyle
Body Shape
Classical vs Medium Jumbo
Compact body with soft nylon strings
Scale Length
25.6'' (650.2mm) vs 25'' (635mm)
Lower action and brighter natural tone
Fretboard Radius
Flat vs 15.75'' (400.1mm)
Flatter fretboard makes it easier to play single notes and bend
Value Score
81 vs 80
Better price/quality relationship

Reasons to Get
Yamaha CPX700II-12 over CG162S

Release Year
2015 vs 2013
From a more recent year
Strings
12 vs 6
Allows you to play lower notes
Nut Width
1.811'' (46mm) vs 2.047'' (52mm)
Favors small hands, easier bar chords and other shapes
Body Shape
Medium Jumbo vs Classical
Smaller than a Jumbo guitar but larger than a Thinline
Scale Length
25'' (635mm) vs 25.6'' (650.2mm)
Easier bending, shorter fret separation and warmer natural tone
Fretboard Radius
15.75'' (400.1mm) vs Flat
Easier to play chords without muting strings

Other Key Differences
Yamaha CG162S vs CPX700II-12

Back Material
Ovangkol vs Okoume
Different Back Material
Sides Material
Ovangkol vs Okoume
Different Sides Material
Headstock
3-3 vs 6-6
Different Headstock

Shared Features
Yamaha CG162S vs CPX700II-12

Saddle Material
Plastic
Same Saddle Material
Bridge Material
Rosewood
Same Bridge Material
Body Wood
Spruce
Same Body Wood
Neck Wood
Nato
Same Neck Wood
Fretboard Wood
Rosewood
Same Fretboard Wood
Nut Material
Plastic
Same Nut Material
Body Type
Hollowbody
Warm tone, lighter and acoustic sound
Switch Positions
0
Same pickups versatility
Volume Knobs
0
Same volume control
Tone Knobs
0
Same tone control
Number of Frets
20
Same maximum octave
Paint Finish
Poly
Resistant paint that ages well
Bridge
Fixed
Good sustain and needs no set-up
Neck Profile Type
C
Comfortable neck that works for most people
Type of Frets
Medium
You'll feel the fretboard when pressing down the strings

Common Strengths

  • Solid Top Wood
  • Expensive Wood

Common Weaknesses

  • Solid Side Wood
  • Solid Back Wood
  • Pickup Alter Switch/Knob
  • Locking Tuners
  • High-Quality Nut
  • High-Quality Frets
  • Compound Radius Fretboard
  • From a High-Quality-Standards Country
  • Luminescent Sidedots
  • Strap Lock
  • Top Pickup Brand
  • 21:1 Tuner Ratio
  • Active/Passive Preamp

Price History Comparison

SET PRICE ALERT

Yamaha CPX700II-12 Prices

    SET PRICE ALERT

    These are affiliate links. We may earn a fee if you purchase after clicking. These prices are prone to error. Make sure you're buying the right product after clicking on a link from our site. We are not liable if you buy the wrong product after following these links. As an Amazon Associate site we earn from qualifying purchases.

    Which One is Better for Beginners?

    Both meet 5 out of our 8 criteria items for beginner friendliness. This takes into account the type of frets, scale length, nut width, bridge type, fretboard radius, and neck profile to determine the easiest combination for new players. If you're looking for your first guitar to learn how to play, you can't go wrong with either of them.

    New Player Friendliness

    Yamaha CG162S
    • Comfortable shape
    • Easy-to-use bridge
    • Tall frets
    • Comfortable neck
    • Soft Strings
    • Comfortable fretboard
    • Narrow nut
    • Short scale
    • Locking tuners

    New Player Friendliness

    Yamaha CPX700II-12
    • Comfortable shape
    • Easy-to-use bridge
    • Tall frets
    • Narrow nut
    • Comfortable neck
    • Comfortable fretboard
    • Short scale
    • Soft Strings
    • Locking tuners

    Nevertheless, when it comes to choosing an instrument, you should pick the one more compatible with your personal style. Still, below we'll try you to give you our results as objectively as it's possible to help you decide.

    Sound Quality Comparison

    The most important thing that will determine the tone of an acoustic guitar is the wood. Let's take a look at the differences between both .

    Woods Used in Both

    Nato wood pattern used for guitar building
    Nato
    Rosewood wood pattern used for guitar building
    Rosewood
    Spruce wood pattern used for guitar building
    Spruce

    Nato a hard and dense wood similar to Mahogany, but cheaper and not quite as hard. Tone-wise, it's also similar, but it doesn't have quite the same attack as Mahogany.

    Rosewood is an almost purple-looking wood that is used mainly for fretboards since it's heavy, rare, and expensive. It's sometimes used on acoustic guitar bodies to create stronger warm tones. Find out more about Rosewood.

    Spruce has a light color with tight grain patterns. It's very stiff but relatively light. It's known for producing a well-rounded tone with a broad dynamic range. Find out more about Spruce.

    Woods Used in the Yamaha CG162S

    Ovangkol wood pattern used for guitar building
    Ovangkol

    Ovangkol is a beautiful wood that's popular for acoustic guitars. Its tone sits somewhere between rosewood and mahogany, meaning it has a punchy low-end and nice mid-range. Find out more about Ovangkol.

    Woods Used in the Yamaha CPX700II-12

    Okoume wood pattern used for guitar building
    Okoume

    Okoume is an affordable wood and one of the first to replace Mahogany when the prohibitions started. It's generally softer than Mahogany and the tone has warmer lows.

    Winner: Tie.

    Electronics

    The Yamaha CPX700II-12 comes with a preamp that allows you to connect it to an amp, unlike its competitor. This allows it to have more versatility and sound quality if you want to record with it or play live.

    Winner:Yamaha CPX700II-12.

    Final Sound Quality Scores

    Yamaha CG162S
    Sustain 70
    Versatility 80
    Tuning Stability 65
    Sound 79
    Yamaha CPX700II-12
    Sustain 75
    Versatility 85
    Tuning Stability 65
    Sound 81

    Build Quality Comparison

    When it comes to build quality, we like to take into account everything used to build the instrument. This includes materials, hardware and the quality control expected depending on the country where it was built. Let's see how the Yamaha CG162S compares to the Yamaha CPX700II-12.

    Country of Origin

    The manufacturing country can tell a lot about the build quality of an instrument. Both in this comparison where made in China.

    China has a bad reputation when it comes to building quality. However, times have changed and now respectable brands use China's cheap labor to build good instruments for a lower price. Don't discount a guitar only because it was built in China, but also expect more quality from countries like Korea.

    Winner: Tie

    Nut Material

    If you want your guitar to stay in tune and sound good, you need a well cut nut. Nut quality can be inconsistent even when comparing two copies of the same model. The best way to make sure you're nut will be well done is by getting a nut made by an expert company like TUSQ or Micarta.

    In this case, both have Plastic nuts. This is a low-quality nut that you might want to consider upgrading soon. Bone and TUSQ nuts are the best for guitars with a fixed or simple tremolo bridge.

    Fret Material

    Most fret wire is made of nickel silver. This material eventually wears down after a lot of use and most instruments end up needing a complete fret replacement. However, some expensive models come with stainless steel frets. This is what you should aim for if you can afford it.

    Unfortunately, none of them come with stainless steel frets.

    Winner: Tie.

    Tuners

    Both come with regular tuners. The Yamaha CG162S's are Gold while the Yamaha CPX700II-12's are Die-Cast Chrome (TMW28)

    Winner: Tie.

    Here is the list of features that were considered when choosing the winner in the Features subcategory:

    Strengths & Weaknesses
    Yamaha CG162S
    • Expensive Wood
    • Solid Top Wood
    • Cheap Fret Wire (NS)
    • No Locking Tuners
    • Made in China
    • No High-Quality Nut
    • No Top Brand Pickups
    • No Electronics
    • Low-Quality Material Saddle
    • Laminated Side Wood
    • Laminated Back Wood
    • No Compound Radius Fretboard
    • No 21:1 Tuner Ratio
    • No Strap Lock
    Strengths & Weaknesses
    Yamaha CPX700II-12
    • Expensive Wood
    • Electronics
    • Solid Top Wood
    • Cheap Fret Wire (NS)
    • No Locking Tuners
    • Made in China
    • No High-Quality Nut
    • No Top Brand Pickups
    • Low-Quality Material Saddle
    • Laminated Side Wood
    • Laminated Back Wood
    • No Compound Radius Fretboard
    • No 21:1 Tuner Ratio
    • No Strap Lock

    Final Build Quality Scores

    Yamaha CG162S
    Quality of materials 61
    Features 65
    Quality Control 55
    Build Quality 60
    Yamaha CPX700II-12
    Quality of materials 61
    Features 75
    Quality Control 60
    Build Quality 65

    Playability Comparison

    Let's now compare their playability. Bear in mind that the instrument will feel different depending on your hand size and play style. That's why you should always test before buying. But if you can't or want a second opinion on it, we can still take a look at each of the important measurements of the instrument for you. This way, we can predict how easy a guitar might be to play, or how different it will feel compared to the other.

    Remember that, even though the difference might seem small, every inch counts when it comes to feeling of the instrument in your hands. Any variation can completely change how comfortable a guitar feels in your hands.

    Nut Width

    Yamaha CG162S Nut Width
    Yamaha CG162S Nut Width
    Yamaha CPX700II-12 Nut Width
    Yamaha CPX700II-12 Nut Width

    The nut width will affect the separation between strings at the nut. In this comparison, the Yamaha CG162S has the wider nut with 52mm (2.047'') vs 46mm (1.811''). This is a 6mm (0.236'') difference

    This means that it will be more difficult to do bar chords on the Yamaha CG162S, especially closer to the nut. However, it's also easier to play without muting strings accidently. This favors people with big hands.

    Scale Length

    Yamaha CG162S's Scale Length
    Yamaha CG162S's Scale Length
    Yamaha CPX700II-12's Scale Length
    Yamaha CPX700II-12's Scale Length

    The scale length is one of the things that influences playability the most. This is the distance between the nut and the bridge and will affect everything from low action allowance, difficulty to perform bends, fret separation, and even tone.

    The Yamaha CG162S has the longest scale: 25.6". The Yamaha CPX700II-12 is only 25" long. This is a 0.6'' (15.2mm) scale length difference.

    This longer scale means that the strings need more tension to get in tune. This is good if you want to avoid fret buzz, which can happen when the strings are too loose and touch the frets while vibrating. This is especially important when playing in lower tunings. This will also let you reduce the gap between fretboard and strings (low action) to make them easier to press down. However, this higher tension will also make it harder to perform bends and vibratos as the strings will feel stiffer.

    This also means that the frets have a longer separation between each other, so this will make it harder for people with smaller hands when playing some chord positions.

    Another characteristic of a longer scale is that it makes the guitar sound 'snappier' or brighter. This is due to the extra separation between harmonics and overtones produced by the tension. This influences tone more than any other factor (except the pickups).

    Lastly, remember that you can also affect the tension of the strings by changing your string gauge. You can use a thicker gauge for more tension and a lighter one for less tension.

    Neck Profile

    Yamaha CG162S Neck Profile
    Both guitars have the same neck profile

    No single neck shape is better than others. However, most people tend to prefer a thinner necks because it doesn't get in their way when playing fast and most hand sizes can adapt to it pretty well. However, some people still prefer thicker necks for a better grip, especially if they have big hands.

    Both the Yamaha CG162S and the Yamaha CPX700II-12 have a C-shaped neck. This is what you'll find in most modern guitars. Most people feel like the thickness of a C neck is simply the less intrusive one for playing fast, while at the same time allowing you to grab the neck easily for resting if you want to.

    Fretboard Radius

    Yamaha CG162S Fingerboard Radius
    Yamaha CG162S's Fingerboard radius
    Yamaha CPX700II-12 Fingerboard Radius
    Yamaha CPX700II-12's Fingerboard radius

    Most guitar fretboards are not flat; they usually have a curve or arc across their width. A curved fretboard will make it easier to perform chords without muting strings, while a flatter one will make it easier to play single notes, which is good for bending and soloing in general. The best fretboards have a compound radius that varies across the fingerboard, but they're not common since they take a lot more work to build.

    In this case, the Yamaha CPX700II-12's fingerboard radius is smaller, which means it's more curved than the Yamaha CG162S's. This extra arc will make playing chords easier in this model. You won't be as likely to mute the strings, especially if you have big hands. However, playing single notes and bending will be easier on the Yamaha CG162S.

    Hand Size Comfortability

    Everyone has a different hand size, and that's why it's recommended to try a guitar before buying, even if others tell you that it's comfortable to play. However, we can know whether a guitar favors small or large hands just by knowing its exact measurements.

    And after taking into account the scale length, nut width, neck profile and fretboard radius, we can conclude that the Yamaha CG162S favors large hands more than the Yamaha CPX700II-12.

    Yamaha CG162S:
    Big Hands
    Small Hands
    Yamaha CPX700II-12:
    Big Hands
    Small Hands

    Fret Size

    Yamaha CG162S and Yamaha CPX700II-12 Frets Size
    Both have a similar Medium fret size

    Both have a Medium fret size. If you like feeling the fretboard when you play, but also appreciate some easiness to press down the frets, this size offers a good balance for that.

    Final Playability Scores

    Yamaha CG162S
    Bending & Vibrato Ease 75
    Chord Playability 65
    Solo Playability 80
    Playability 73
    Yamaha CPX700II-12
    Bending & Vibrato Ease 80
    Chord Playability 80
    Solo Playability 80
    Playability 80

    Specs Side-by-Side

    Yamaha CG162S vs CPX700II-12
    General Yamaha CG162S CPX700II-12
    Brand: Yamaha Yamaha
    Year: 2013 2015
    Strings: 6 12
    Made in: China China
    Series: CG & CGX Classical Guitars CPX
    Colors: Natural Natural
    Left-Handed Version: No No
    Body
    Type: Hollowbody Hollowbody
    Body Material: Solid Spruce Solid Spruce
    Sides Material: Ovangkol Okoume
    Back Material: Ovangkol Okoume
    Bridge: Rosewood Rosewood
    Neck
    Neck Joint: Set Set
    Tuners: Gold Die-Cast Chrome (TMW28)
    Fretboard: Rosewood Rosewood
    Neck Material: Nato Nato
    Decoration: Pearloid Dots
    Scale Size: 25.6" 25"
    Shape: Acoustic C Acoustic C
    Frets: 20 Medium Nickel Silver 20 Medium Nickel Silver
    Fretboard Radius: Flat 15.75"
    Nut: Plastic Plastic
    Nut Width: 52mm (2.047'') 46mm (1.811'')
    Electronics
    Bridge Pickup: SYSTEM64 + ART 1-Way Pickup (Preamp / Active)