Swap
Swap
Martin OMC-X1E
Yamaha FS800
VS
Playability
73
Sound
80
Build
66
Value
78
Score
73
FIND IT ON:
Sweetwater logo
Playability
77
Sound
79
Build
62
Value
83
Score
73
FIND IT ON:
Sweetwater logoReverb logoAmazon logoMusician's Friend logo
Add to Compare
Add to Compare
Side to side spec comparison >

Martin OMC-X1E vs Yamaha FS800

Reasons to Get
Martin OMC-X1E over Yamaha FS800

Country of Manufacturing
Mexico vs China
Built with higher quality standards
Release Year
2020 vs 2016
From a more recent year
Pickups Brand
Fishman vs None
Pickups from a renown brand
Nut Material
Corian vs Plastic
Similar to Bone, but slightly cheaper
Nut Width
1.75'' (44.5mm) vs 1.693'' (43mm)
Less likely to mute strings by accident and more space for fingerstyle
Body Shape
Auditorium vs Concert
Narrower and shallower than a Dreadnought with less lower tones
Scale Length
25.4'' (645.2mm) vs 25'' (635mm)
Lower action and brighter natural tone
Fretboard Radius
16'' (406.4mm) vs 15.75'' (400.1mm)
Flatter fretboard makes it easier to play single notes and bend

Reasons to Get
Yamaha FS800 over Martin OMC-X1E

Top Wood
Solid vs Laminated
Helps with richer tones and louder volume
Nut Width
1.693'' (43mm) vs 1.75'' (44.5mm)
Favors small hands, easier bar chords and other shapes
Body Shape
Concert vs Auditorium
Compact body with balanced tones
Scale Length
25'' (635mm) vs 25.4'' (645.2mm)
Easier bending, shorter fret separation and warmer natural tone
Fretboard Radius
15.75'' (400.1mm) vs 16'' (406.4mm)
Easier to play chords without muting strings
Value Score
83 vs 78
Better price/quality relationship

Other Key Differences
Martin OMC-X1E vs Yamaha FS800

Back Material
HPL vs Okoume
Different Back Material
Sides Material
HPL vs Okoume
Different Sides Material
Saddle Material
Black Tusq XL vs Plastic
Different Saddle Material
Bridge Material
FSC Certified Richlite vs Walnut
Different Bridge Material
Body Wood
HPL vs Spruce
Different Body Wood
Neck Wood
Birch vs Nato
Different Neck Wood
Fretboard Wood
Richlite vs Walnut
Different Fretboard Wood
Nut Material
Corian vs Plastic
Different Nut Material

Shared Features
Martin OMC-X1E vs Yamaha FS800

Headstock
3-3
Same Headstock
Strings
6
Same playing style
Body Type
Hollowbody
Warm tone, lighter and acoustic sound
Switch Positions
0
Same pickups versatility
Volume Knobs
0
Same volume control
Tone Knobs
0
Same tone control
Number of Frets
20
Same maximum octave
Paint Finish
Poly
Resistant paint that ages well
Bridge
Fixed
Good sustain and needs no set-up
Neck Profile Type
C
Comfortable neck that works for most people
Type of Frets
Medium
You'll feel the fretboard when pressing down the strings

Common Weaknesses

  • Solid Side Wood
  • Solid Back Wood
  • Pickup Alter Switch/Knob
  • Locking Tuners
  • High-Quality Frets
  • Compound Radius Fretboard
  • Luminescent Sidedots
  • Strap Lock
  • Expensive Wood
  • 21:1 Tuner Ratio
  • Active/Passive Preamp

Price History Comparison

Martin OMC-X1E Prices

    SET PRICE ALERT
    SET PRICE ALERT

    These are affiliate links. We may earn a fee if you purchase after clicking. These prices are prone to error. Make sure you're buying the right product after clicking on a link from our site. We are not liable if you buy the wrong product after following these links. As an Amazon Associate site we earn from qualifying purchases.

    Which One is Better for Beginners?

    The Yamaha FS800 meets 4 out of our 8 criteria items for beginner friendliness, while the Martin OMC-X1E meets only 3. This takes into account the type of frets, scale length, nut width, bridge type, fretboard radius, and neck profile to determine the easiest combination for new players.

    New Player Friendliness

    Martin OMC-X1E
    • Easy-to-use bridge
    • Tall frets
    • Comfortable neck
    • Comfortable shape
    • Comfortable fretboard
    • Narrow nut
    • Short scale
    • Soft Strings
    • Locking tuners

    New Player Friendliness

    Yamaha FS800
    • Comfortable shape
    • Easy-to-use bridge
    • Tall frets
    • Comfortable neck
    • Comfortable fretboard
    • Narrow nut
    • Short scale
    • Soft Strings
    • Locking tuners

    Nevertheless, when it comes to choosing an instrument, you should pick the one more compatible with your personal style. Still, below we'll try you to give you our results as objectively as it's possible to help you decide.

    Sound Quality Comparison

    The most important thing that will determine the tone of an acoustic guitar is the wood. Let's take a look at the differences between both .

    Woods Used in the Martin OMC-X1E

    Birch wood pattern used for guitar building
    Birch
    Richlite wood pattern used for guitar building
    Richlite
    HPL wood pattern used for guitar building
    HPL

    Birch wood is a hardwood with a light color and a fine, even grain. It has good dimensional stability and is resistant to warping. It's used as a cheaper replacement for maple. The tone produced by birch wood is typically described as being warm, clear, and resonant.

    It's very similar to Ebony, but it is much cheaper to make. The main reason is that it is made from resin-infused paper. It is very durable and soft, so it's often used for fretboards and tops.

    HPL is a high-pressure laminate made from multiple layers of paper or fabric that are impregnated with resin and then fused together under high pressure and heat.

    Woods Used in the Yamaha FS800

    Nato wood pattern used for guitar building
    Nato
    Walnut wood pattern used for guitar building
    Walnut
    Spruce wood pattern used for guitar building
    Spruce
    Okoume wood pattern used for guitar building
    Okoume

    Nato a hard and dense wood similar to Mahogany, but cheaper and not quite as hard. Tone-wise, it's also similar, but it doesn't have quite the same attack as Mahogany.

    It's a hard wood with a chocolate color that is often used to give an elegant finish. Since it's quite expensive and rare, it's mostly used for guitar tops. Find out more about Walnut.

    Spruce has a light color with tight grain patterns. It's very stiff but relatively light. It's known for producing a well-rounded tone with a broad dynamic range. Find out more about Spruce.

    Okoume is an affordable wood and one of the first to replace Mahogany when the prohibitions started. It's generally softer than Mahogany and the tone has warmer lows.

    Winner: Tie.

    Electronics

    The Martin OMC-X1E comes with a preamp that allows you to connect it to an amp, unlike its competitor. This allows it to have more versatility and sound quality if you want to record with it or play live.

    Winner:Martin OMC-X1E.

    Final Sound Quality Scores

    Martin OMC-X1E
    Sustain 65
    Versatility 85
    Tuning Stability 70
    Sound 80
    Yamaha FS800
    Sustain 70
    Versatility 80
    Tuning Stability 65
    Sound 79

    Build Quality Comparison

    When it comes to build quality, we like to take into account everything used to build the instrument. This includes materials, hardware and the quality control expected depending on the country where it was built. Let's see how the Martin OMC-X1E compares to the Yamaha FS800.

    Country of Origin

    The manufacturing country can tell a lot about the build quality of an instrument. The Martin OMC-X1E is built in Mexico while the Yamaha FS800 is made in China.

    Mexico has been for a long time where Fender has built their semi-premium series. If you don't want to overpay for a wellp-built instrument, a guitar built in this country by a good brand always offers good value for the money.

    China has a bad reputation when it comes to building quality. However, times have changed and now respectable brands use China's cheap labor to build good instruments for a lower price. Don't discount a guitar only because it was built in China, but also expect more quality from countries like Korea.

    Winner: Martin OMC-X1E

    Nut Material

    If you want your guitar to stay in tune and sound good, you need a well cut nut. Nut quality can be inconsistent even when comparing two copies of the same model. The best way to make sure you're nut will be well done is by getting a nut made by an expert company like TUSQ or Micarta.

    The Martin OMC-X1E has a Corian nut. It used to be the go-to nut for Gibson, but it's slowly being replaced by Graph Tech (Tusq). It's a synthetic material made to be similar to Bone, but it doesn't have the same self-lubricating properties, and it's less resistant.

    On the other hand, the Yamaha FS800 comes with a Plastic nut. This is a low-quality nut that you might want to consider upgrading soon. Bone and TUSQ nuts are the best for guitars with a fixed or simple tremolo bridge.

    Winner: Martin OMC-X1E.

    Fret Material

    Most fret wire is made of nickel silver. This material eventually wears down after a lot of use and most instruments end up needing a complete fret replacement. However, some expensive models come with stainless steel frets. This is what you should aim for if you can afford it.

    Unfortunately, none of them come with stainless steel frets.

    Winner: Tie.

    Tuners

    Both come with regular tuners. The Martin OMC-X1E's are Chrome Enclosed Gear while the Yamaha FS800's are Die-Cast Chrome (TM29T)

    Winner: Tie.

    Here is the list of features that were considered when choosing the winner in the Features subcategory:

    Strengths & Weaknesses
    Martin OMC-X1E
    • Top Brand Pickups
    • Electronics
    • Cheap Fret Wire (NS)
    • No Locking Tuners
    • Made in Mexico
    • No Expensive Woods
    • No High-Quality Nut
    • Low-Quality Material Saddle
    • Laminated Top Wood
    • Laminated Side Wood
    • Laminated Back Wood
    • No Compound Radius Fretboard
    • No 21:1 Tuner Ratio
    • No Strap Lock
    Strengths & Weaknesses
    Yamaha FS800
    • Solid Top Wood
    • Cheap Fret Wire (NS)
    • No Locking Tuners
    • Made in China
    • No Expensive Woods
    • No High-Quality Nut
    • No Top Brand Pickups
    • No Electronics
    • Low-Quality Material Saddle
    • Laminated Side Wood
    • Laminated Back Wood
    • No Compound Radius Fretboard
    • No 21:1 Tuner Ratio
    • No Strap Lock

    Final Build Quality Scores

    Martin OMC-X1E
    Quality of materials 43
    Features 85
    Quality Control 70
    Build Quality 66
    Yamaha FS800
    Quality of materials 66
    Features 65
    Quality Control 55
    Build Quality 62

    Playability Comparison

    Let's now compare their playability. Bear in mind that the instrument will feel different depending on your hand size and play style. That's why you should always test before buying. But if you can't or want a second opinion on it, we can still take a look at each of the important measurements of the instrument for you. This way, we can predict how easy a guitar might be to play, or how different it will feel compared to the other.

    Remember that, even though the difference might seem small, every inch counts when it comes to feeling of the instrument in your hands. Any variation can completely change how comfortable a guitar feels in your hands.

    Nut Width

    Martin OMC-X1E Nut Width
    Martin OMC-X1E Nut Width
    Yamaha FS800 Nut Width
    Yamaha FS800 Nut Width

    The nut width will affect the separation between strings at the nut. In this comparison, the Martin OMC-X1E has the wider nut with 44.5mm (1.75'') vs 43mm (1.693''). This is a 1.5mm (0.057'') difference

    This means that it will be more difficult to do bar chords on the Martin OMC-X1E, especially closer to the nut. However, it's also easier to play without muting strings accidently. This favors people with big hands.

    Scale Length

    Martin OMC-X1E's Scale Length
    Martin OMC-X1E's Scale Length
    Yamaha FS800's Scale Length
    Yamaha FS800's Scale Length

    The scale length is one of the things that influences playability the most. This is the distance between the nut and the bridge and will affect everything from low action allowance, difficulty to perform bends, fret separation, and even tone.

    The Martin OMC-X1E has the longest scale: 25.4". The Yamaha FS800 is only 25" long. This is a 0.4'' (10.2mm) scale length difference.

    This longer scale means that the strings need more tension to get in tune. This is good if you want to avoid fret buzz, which can happen when the strings are too loose and touch the frets while vibrating. This is especially important when playing in lower tunings. This will also let you reduce the gap between fretboard and strings (low action) to make them easier to press down. However, this higher tension will also make it harder to perform bends and vibratos as the strings will feel stiffer.

    This also means that the frets have a longer separation between each other, so this will make it harder for people with smaller hands when playing some chord positions.

    Another characteristic of a longer scale is that it makes the guitar sound 'snappier' or brighter. This is due to the extra separation between harmonics and overtones produced by the tension. This influences tone more than any other factor (except the pickups).

    Lastly, remember that you can also affect the tension of the strings by changing your string gauge. You can use a thicker gauge for more tension and a lighter one for less tension.

    Neck Profile

    Martin OMC-X1E Neck Profile
    Martin OMC-X1E's neck profile
    Yamaha FS800 Neck Profile
    Yamaha FS800's neck profile

    No single neck shape is better than others. However, most people tend to prefer a thinner necks because it doesn't get in their way when playing fast and most hand sizes can adapt to it pretty well. However, some people still prefer thicker necks for a better grip, especially if they have big hands.

    Both the Martin OMC-X1E and the Yamaha FS800 have a C-shaped neck. This is what you'll find in most modern guitars. Most people feel like the thickness of a C neck is simply the less intrusive one for playing fast, while at the same time allowing you to grab the neck easily for resting if you want to.

    Fretboard Radius

    Martin OMC-X1E Fingerboard Radius
    Martin OMC-X1E's Fingerboard radius
    Yamaha FS800 Fingerboard Radius
    Yamaha FS800's Fingerboard radius

    Most guitar fretboards are not flat; they usually have a curve or arc across their width. A curved fretboard will make it easier to perform chords without muting strings, while a flatter one will make it easier to play single notes, which is good for bending and soloing in general. The best fretboards have a compound radius that varies across the fingerboard, but they're not common since they take a lot more work to build.

    In this case, the Yamaha FS800's fingerboard radius is smaller, which means it's more curved than the Martin OMC-X1E's. This extra arc will make playing chords easier in this model. You won't be as likely to mute the strings, especially if you have big hands. However, playing single notes and bending will be easier on the Martin OMC-X1E.

    Still, both tend to favor soloing over chords, so if you're looking for a guitar for playing rhythm, you might want something else with a radius closer to a Stratocaster's 9.5''.

    Hand Size Comfortability

    Everyone has a different hand size, and that's why it's recommended to try a guitar before buying, even if others tell you that it's comfortable to play. However, we can know whether a guitar favors small or large hands just by knowing its exact measurements.

    After taking into account the scale length, nut width, neck profile and fretboard radius, we can conclude that both in this comparison favor small hands .

    Martin OMC-X1E:
    Big Hands
    Small Hands
    Yamaha FS800:
    Big Hands
    Small Hands

    Fret Size

    Martin OMC-X1E and Yamaha FS800 Frets Size
    Both have a similar Medium fret size

    Both have a Medium fret size. If you like feeling the fretboard when you play, but also appreciate some easiness to press down the frets, this size offers a good balance for that.

    Final Playability Scores

    Martin OMC-X1E
    Bending & Vibrato Ease 75
    Chord Playability 65
    Solo Playability 80
    Playability 73
    Yamaha FS800
    Bending & Vibrato Ease 80
    Chord Playability 70
    Solo Playability 80
    Playability 77

    Specs Side-by-Side

    Martin OMC-X1E vs Yamaha FS800
    General Martin OMC-X1E Yamaha FS800
    Brand: Martin Yamaha
    Year: 2020 2016
    Strings: 6 6
    Made in: Mexico China
    Series: X FG / FGX
    Colors: Natural Natural
    Left-Handed Version: Yes No
    Body
    Type: Hollowbody Hollowbody
    Body Material: HPL Solid Spruce
    Sides Material: HPL Okoume
    Back Material: HPL Okoume
    Bridge: FSC Certified Richlite Walnut
    Neck
    Neck Joint: Set Set
    Tuners: Chrome Enclosed Gear Die-Cast Chrome (TM29T)
    Fretboard: FSC Certified Richlite Walnut
    Neck Material: Black Birch Laminate Nato
    Decoration: Mother-of-Pearl Pattern Style 28 Dots
    Scale Size: 25.4" 25"
    Shape: Acoustic Performing Artist Acoustic C
    Frets: 20 Medium Nickel Silver 20 Medium Nickel Silver
    Fretboard Radius: 16" 15.75"
    Nut: Corian Plastic
    Nut Width: 44.5mm (1.75'') 43mm (1.693'')
    Electronics
    Bridge Pickup: Fishman MX (Preamp / Active)