Swap
Swap
Yamaha LL6M ARE
Epiphone J-200 EC Studio
VS
Playability
73
Sound
83
Build
69
Value
80
Score
75
FIND IT ON:
Sweetwater logo
Playability
77
Sound
83
Build
74
Value
83
Score
78
FIND IT ON:
Sweetwater logoReverb logoAmazon logoMusician's Friend logo
Add to Compare
Add to Compare
Side to side spec comparison >

Yamaha LL6M ARE vs Epiphone J-200 EC Studio

Reasons to Get
Yamaha LL6M ARE over Epiphone J-200 EC Studio

Release Year
2014 vs 2013
From a more recent year
Neck Profile
Acoustic C vs Acoustic 1960's SlimTaper D-shape
Comfortable neck that works for most people
Pickup Mods
Multi-Voicing vs None
Changes the voice (tones or gain) of the pickups
Nut Width
1.732'' (44mm) vs 1.68'' (42.7mm)
Less likely to mute strings by accident and more space for fingerstyle
Scale Length
25.6'' (650.2mm) vs 25.5'' (647.7mm)
Lower action and brighter natural tone
Fretboard Radius
15.75'' (400.1mm) vs 12'' (304.8mm)
Flatter fretboard makes it easier to play single notes and bend

Reasons to Get
Epiphone J-200 EC Studio over Yamaha LL6M ARE

Frets Height
Taller vs Shorter
Easier to press down strings and bend them
Neck Profile
Acoustic 1960's SlimTaper D-shape vs Acoustic C
Thin and flat neck for playing fast
Pickups Brand
Fishman vs None
Pickups from a renown brand
Nut Width
1.68'' (42.7mm) vs 1.732'' (44mm)
Favors small hands, easier bar chords and other shapes
Scale Length
25.5'' (647.7mm) vs 25.6'' (650.2mm)
Easier bending, shorter fret separation and warmer natural tone
Fretboard Radius
12'' (304.8mm) vs 15.75'' (400.1mm)
More curved fretboard helpful to play chords without muting strings
Value Score
83 vs 80
Better price/quality relationship

Other Key Differences
Yamaha LL6M ARE vs Epiphone J-200 EC Studio

Back Material
Mahogany vs Maple
Different Back Material
Sides Material
Mahogany vs Maple
Different Sides Material
Bridge Material
Rosewood vs Pau Ferro; Classic Moustache shape
Different Bridge Material
Fretboard Wood
Rosewood vs Pau Ferro
Different Fretboard Wood

Shared Features
Yamaha LL6M ARE vs Epiphone J-200 EC Studio

Saddle Material
Plastic
Same Saddle Material
Body Wood
Spruce
Same Body Wood
Neck Wood
Mahogany
Same Neck Wood
Headstock
3-3
Same Headstock
Nut Material
Plastic
Same Nut Material
Strings
6
Same playing style
Body Type
Hollowbody
Warm tone, lighter and acoustic sound
Switch Positions
0
Same pickups versatility
Volume Knobs
0
Same volume control
Tone Knobs
0
Same tone control
Number of Frets
20
Same maximum octave
Paint Finish
Poly
Resistant paint that ages well
Bridge
Fixed
Good sustain and needs no set-up
Type of Frets
Medium vs Medium Jumbo
You'll feel the fretboard when pressing down the strings

Common Strengths

  • Solid Top Wood
  • Expensive Wood

Common Weaknesses

  • Solid Side Wood
  • Solid Back Wood
  • Locking Tuners
  • High-Quality Nut
  • High-Quality Frets
  • Compound Radius Fretboard
  • From a High-Quality-Standards Country
  • Luminescent Sidedots
  • Strap Lock
  • 21:1 Tuner Ratio
  • Active/Passive Preamp

Table of Contents

Price History Comparison

Yamaha LL6M ARE Prices

SET PRICE ALERT
SET PRICE ALERT

These are affiliate links. We may earn a fee if you purchase after clicking. These prices are prone to error. Make sure you're buying the right product after clicking on a link from our site. We are not liable if you buy the wrong product after following these links. As an Amazon Associate site we earn from qualifying purchases.

Which One is Better Overall?

After going through our comparison algorithm, the results show that the Epiphone J-200 EC Studio is probably the better product overall with its final score of 78 compared to the Yamaha LL6M ARE's 75 score, although not by a lot.

The Epiphone J-200 EC Studio wins when it comes to playability, build quality, value for the money. On the other hand, the Yamaha LL6M ARE has the upper hand when it comes to.

If you got small hands, you'll probably feel more comfortable playing the Epiphone J-200 EC Studio.

Which One is Better for Beginners?

If you're looking for your first guitar to learn how to play, the Epiphone J-200 EC Studio is the better choice.

The Epiphone J-200 EC Studio meets 4 out of our 8 criteria items for beginner friendliness, while the Yamaha LL6M ARE meets only 3. This takes into account the type of frets, scale length, nut width, bridge type, fretboard radius, and neck profile to determine the easiest combination for new players.

New Player Friendliness

Yamaha LL6M ARE
  • Easy-to-use bridge
  • Tall frets
  • Comfortable neck
  • Comfortable shape
  • Comfortable fretboard
  • Narrow nut
  • Short scale
  • Soft Strings
  • Locking tuners

New Player Friendliness

Epiphone J-200 EC Studio
  • Easy-to-use bridge
  • Tall frets
  • Narrow nut
  • Comfortable neck
  • Comfortable shape
  • Comfortable fretboard
  • Short scale
  • Soft Strings
  • Locking tuners

Nevertheless, when it comes to choosing an instrument, you should pick the one more compatible with your personal style. Still, below we'll try you to give you our results as objectively as it's possible to help you decide.

Yamaha LL6M ARE Overview

  • From Yamaha's 2014 L series
  • Made in China
  • 6 strings
  • 25.6"'' scale
  • 15.75" Fretboard Radius
  • Solid Engelmann Spruce with A.R.E. top
  • Mahogany back
  • Mahogany sides
  • Mahogany + Rosewood (5-Ply) neck
  • Rosewood fretboard
  • Bridge pickup: Passive System + SRT Piezo Pickup (Preamp/Passive)
  • Rosewood bridge
  • Acoustic C Set neck
  • 20 Medium frets
  • Die-Cast Gold (TM29G) tuners
  • Compare Specs >

Epiphone J-200 EC Studio Overview

  • From Epiphone's 2013 Modern Acoustic series
  • Made in China
  • 6 strings
  • 25.5"'' scale
  • 12" Fretboard Radius
  • Solid Spruce top
  • Select Maple back
  • Select Maple sides
  • Mahogany neck
  • Pau Ferro fretboard
  • Bridge pickup: Fishman Sonicore (Preamp/Active)
  • Pau Ferro; Classic Moustache shape bridge
  • Acoustic 1960's SlimTaper D-shape Set neck
  • 20 Medium Jumbo frets
  • Grover Rotomatic; 18:1 ratio tuners
  • Compare Specs >

Sound Quality Comparison

The most important thing that will determine the tone of an acoustic guitar is the wood. Let's take a look at the differences between both .

Woods Used in Both

Mahogany wood pattern used for guitar building
Mahogany
Spruce wood pattern used for guitar building
Spruce

Mahogany is a fairly rare wood nowadays. It's used mostly for bodies due to its relatively lightweight. Gibson popularized it with their Les Paul guitars during their golden years, so this wood has a lot of good reputation behind it. The most expensive type comes from South America and it's still used by Gibson even today. Find out more about Mahogany.

Spruce has a light color with tight grain patterns. It's very stiff but relatively light. It's known for producing a well-rounded tone with a broad dynamic range. Find out more about Spruce.

Woods Used in the Yamaha LL6M ARE

Rosewood wood pattern used for guitar building
Rosewood

Rosewood is an almost purple-looking wood that is used mainly for fretboards since it's heavy, rare, and expensive. It's sometimes used on acoustic guitar bodies to create stronger warm tones. Find out more about Rosewood.

Woods Used in the Epiphone J-200 EC Studio

Pau Ferro wood pattern used for guitar building
Pau Ferro
Maple wood pattern used for guitar building
Maple

Pau Ferro has a dark, chocolate-like color with straight dark grains that is being used as a replacement to Rosewood due to the regulations. It produces a warm tone that is somewhere between Mahogany and Rosewood. Find out more about Pau Ferro.

Maple is one of the most popular necks for good reasons. It is a strong wood that is relatively cheap to make and looks beautiful. The highest quality maple is the hardest that comes from North America. Find out more about Maple.

Winner: Yamaha LL6M ARE.

Electronics

Both come with electronics that allow you connect them to an amplifier or interface for recording.

Winner:Tie.

Final Sound Quality Scores

Yamaha LL6M ARE
Sustain 75
Versatility 90
Tuning Stability 65
Sound 83
Epiphone J-200 EC Studio
Sustain 80
Versatility 85
Tuning Stability 65
Sound 83

Build Quality Comparison

When it comes to build quality, we like to take into account everything used to build the instrument. This includes materials, hardware and the quality control expected depending on the country where it was built. Let's see how the Yamaha LL6M ARE compares to the Epiphone J-200 EC Studio.

Country of Origin

The manufacturing country can tell a lot about the build quality of an instrument. Both in this comparison where made in China.

China has a bad reputation when it comes to building quality. However, times have changed and now respectable brands use China's cheap labor to build good instruments for a lower price. Don't discount a guitar only because it was built in China, but also expect more quality from countries like Korea.

Winner: Tie

Nut Material

If you want your guitar to stay in tune and sound good, you need a well cut nut. Nut quality can be inconsistent even when comparing two copies of the same model. The best way to make sure you're nut will be well done is by getting a nut made by an expert company like TUSQ or Micarta.

In this case, both have Plastic nuts. This is a low-quality nut that you might want to consider upgrading soon. Bone and TUSQ nuts are the best for guitars with a fixed or simple tremolo bridge.

Fret Material

Most fret wire is made of nickel silver. This material eventually wears down after a lot of use and most instruments end up needing a complete fret replacement. However, some expensive models come with stainless steel frets. This is what you should aim for if you can afford it.

Unfortunately, none of them come with stainless steel frets.

Winner: Tie.

Tuners

Both come with regular tuners. The Yamaha LL6M ARE's are Die-Cast Gold (TM29G) while the Epiphone J-200 EC Studio's are Grover Rotomatic; 18:1 ratio

Winner: Tie.

Here is the list of features that were considered when choosing the winner in the Features subcategory:

Strengths & Weaknesses
Yamaha LL6M ARE
  • Expensive Wood
  • Electronics
  • Solid Top Wood
  • Cheap Fret Wire (NS)
  • No Locking Tuners
  • Made in China
  • No High-Quality Nut
  • No Top Brand Pickups
  • Low-Quality Material Saddle
  • Laminated Side Wood
  • Laminated Back Wood
  • No Compound Radius Fretboard
  • No 21:1 Tuner Ratio
  • No Strap Lock
Strengths & Weaknesses
Epiphone J-200 EC Studio
  • Expensive Wood
  • Top Brand Pickups
  • Electronics
  • Solid Top Wood
  • Cheap Fret Wire (NS)
  • No Locking Tuners
  • Made in China
  • No High-Quality Nut
  • Low-Quality Material Saddle
  • Laminated Side Wood
  • Laminated Back Wood
  • No Compound Radius Fretboard
  • No 21:1 Tuner Ratio
  • No Strap Lock

Final Build Quality Scores

Yamaha LL6M ARE
Quality of materials 66
Features 80
Quality Control 60
Build Quality 69
Epiphone J-200 EC Studio
Quality of materials 76
Features 85
Quality Control 60
Build Quality 74

Playability Comparison

Let's now compare their playability. Bear in mind that the instrument will feel different depending on your hand size and play style. That's why you should always test before buying. But if you can't or want a second opinion on it, we can still take a look at each of the important measurements of the instrument for you. This way, we can predict how easy a guitar might be to play, or how different it will feel compared to the other.

Remember that, even though the difference might seem small, every inch counts when it comes to feeling of the instrument in your hands. Any variation can completely change how comfortable a guitar feels in your hands.

Nut Width

Yamaha LL6M ARE Nut Width
Yamaha LL6M ARE Nut Width
Epiphone J-200 EC Studio Nut Width
Epiphone J-200 EC Studio Nut Width

The nut width will affect the separation between strings at the nut. In this comparison, the Yamaha LL6M ARE has the wider nut with 44mm (1.732'') vs 42.7mm (1.68''). This is a 1.3mm (0.052'') difference

This means that it will be more difficult to do bar chords on the Yamaha LL6M ARE, especially closer to the nut. However, it's also easier to play without muting strings accidently. This favors people with big hands.

Scale Length

Yamaha LL6M ARE's Scale Length
Yamaha LL6M ARE's Scale Length
Epiphone J-200 EC Studio's Scale Length
Epiphone J-200 EC Studio's Scale Length

The scale length is one of the things that influences playability the most. This is the distance between the nut and the bridge and will affect everything from low action allowance, difficulty to perform bends, fret separation, and even tone.

The Yamaha LL6M ARE has the longest scale: 25.6". The Epiphone J-200 EC Studio is only 25.5" long. This is a 0.1'' (2.5mm) scale length difference.

This longer scale means that the strings need more tension to get in tune. This is good if you want to avoid fret buzz, which can happen when the strings are too loose and touch the frets while vibrating. This is especially important when playing in lower tunings. This will also let you reduce the gap between fretboard and strings (low action) to make them easier to press down. However, this higher tension will also make it harder to perform bends and vibratos as the strings will feel stiffer.

This also means that the frets have a longer separation between each other, so this will make it harder for people with smaller hands when playing some chord positions.

Another characteristic of a longer scale is that it makes the guitar sound 'snappier' or brighter. This is due to the extra separation between harmonics and overtones produced by the tension. This influences tone more than any other factor (except the pickups).

Lastly, remember that you can also affect the tension of the strings by changing your string gauge. You can use a thicker gauge for more tension and a lighter one for less tension.

Neck Profile

Yamaha LL6M ARE Neck Profile
Yamaha LL6M ARE's neck profile
Epiphone J-200 EC Studio Neck Profile
Epiphone J-200 EC Studio's neck profile

No single neck shape is better than others. However, most people tend to prefer a thinner necks because it doesn't get in their way when playing fast and most hand sizes can adapt to it pretty well. However, some people still prefer thicker necks for a better grip, especially if they have big hands.

In this case, both have different neck shapes:

The Yamaha LL6M ARE has a C type of neck. This is what you'll find in most modern guitars. Most people feel like the thickness of a C neck is simply the less intrusive one for playing fast, while at the same time allowing you to grab the neck easily for resting if you want to.

The Epiphone J-200 EC Studio, on the other hand, has a D neck. This is a thin and flat neck that is made for playing fast. If you prefer a neck that doesn't get in your way when soloing, this is the shape you should use. Guitarists that prefer to have a bit more grip won't like this type of neck.

Fretboard Radius

Yamaha LL6M ARE Fingerboard Radius
Yamaha LL6M ARE's Fingerboard radius
Epiphone J-200 EC Studio Fingerboard Radius
Epiphone J-200 EC Studio's Fingerboard radius

Most guitar fretboards are not flat; they usually have a curve or arc across their width. A curved fretboard will make it easier to perform chords without muting strings, while a flatter one will make it easier to play single notes, which is good for bending and soloing in general. The best fretboards have a compound radius that varies across the fingerboard, but they're not common since they take a lot more work to build.

In this case, the Epiphone J-200 EC Studio's fingerboard radius is smaller, which means it's more curved than the Yamaha LL6M ARE's. This extra arc will make playing chords easier in this model. You won't be as likely to mute the strings, especially if you have big hands. However, playing single notes and bending will be easier on the Yamaha LL6M ARE.

Still, both tend to favor soloing over chords, so if you're looking for a guitar for playing rhythm, you might want something else with a radius closer to a Stratocaster's 9.5''.

Hand Size Comfortability

Everyone has a different hand size, and that's why it's recommended to try a guitar before buying, even if others tell you that it's comfortable to play. However, we can know whether a guitar favors small or large hands just by knowing its exact measurements.

And after taking into account the scale length, nut width, neck profile and fretboard radius, we can conclude that the Yamaha LL6M ARE favors large hands more than the Epiphone J-200 EC Studio. But it's still more comfortable for people with small hands, as you can see in the score meter below.

Yamaha LL6M ARE:
Big Hands
Small Hands
Epiphone J-200 EC Studio:
Big Hands
Small Hands

Fret Size

Yamaha LL6M ARE Frets Size
Yamaha LL6M ARE's Frets Size
Epiphone J-200 EC Studio Frets Size
Epiphone J-200 EC Studio's Frets Size

The Epiphone J-200 EC Studio has Medium Jumbo frets, which should be taller than the Yamaha LL6M ARE's Medium frets.

Some people prefer taller frets because they result in more sustain since the strings get pressed cleanly without interference from the fretboard. However, if they're too tall—like Jumbo frets—, you might change the pitch of the strings accidentally if you press too hard because you won't be touching the fretboard with your fingers. This is also why some guitarists with a heavy grip prefer smaller frets. They like to feel the fingerboard to avoid pressing down too hard and getting out of pitch.

Final Playability Scores

Yamaha LL6M ARE
Bending & Vibrato Ease 75
Chord Playability 65
Solo Playability 80
Playability 73
Epiphone J-200 EC Studio
Bending & Vibrato Ease 75
Chord Playability 75
Solo Playability 80
Playability 77

Specs Side-by-Side

Yamaha LL6M ARE vs Epiphone J-200 EC Studio
General Yamaha LL6M ARE Epiphone J-200 EC Studio
Brand: Yamaha Epiphone
Year: 2014 2013
Strings: 6 6
Made in: China China
Series: L Modern Acoustic
Colors: Natural Natural
Left-Handed Version: No No
Body
Type: Hollowbody Hollowbody
Body Material: Solid Engelmann Spruce with A.R.E. Solid Spruce
Sides Material: Mahogany Maple
Back Material: Mahogany Maple
Bridge: Rosewood Pau Ferro; Classic Moustache shape
Neck
Neck Joint: Set Set
Tuners: Die-Cast Gold (TM29G) Grover Rotomatic; 18:1 ratio
Fretboard: Rosewood Pau Ferro
Neck Material: Mahogany + Rosewood (5-Ply) Mahogany
Decoration: Dots Pearloid Crown inlays
Scale Size: 25.6" 25.5"
Shape: Acoustic C Acoustic 1960's SlimTaper D-shape
Frets: 20 Medium Nickel Silver 20 Medium Jumbo Nickel Silver
Fretboard Radius: 15.75" 12"
Nut: Plastic Plastic
Nut Width: 44mm (1.732'') 42.7mm (1.68'')
Electronics
Bridge Pickup: Passive System + SRT Piezo Pickup (Preamp / Passive) Fishman Sonicore (Preamp / Active)